Case Stuff

[David Thompson]

Ok chillins, I decided that a thread was needed that kinda flowed through some of the ideas for the new resolutions, but the rule is you can steal the stuff like chumps, make sure that you ask them about it first, personally, I'm writing blocks against everything I post, so, good luck, heres a K I wrote for the Democratice Ideals rez, if you want the cards give me your email.

Western Morality K
A-Links
1. By assuming the US government should be standard for the entire world, the affirmative props up the spreading of WM
2. The rez is trying to say that the rest of the political world is inferior, which historically, is not true.

B- Impacts
1. Western morality leads to imperialism
2. Western or US morality does not exist
3. Western morality is immoral
4. With WM, comes the spreading of American culture, which promotes psychological violence.
5. American culture also encourages rage and hate crimes.


C- Alternative
1. The alternative to WM is leaving the other countries to their own rights, which are culturally specific
2. Because of this fact, the morality and rights situation should be left to that specific culture
3. “Hard power” does nothing for anyone, “soft power” or choice is what is essential to fulfill the US’s moral obligation.

D- Voters
1. By voting for the negative, the judge is preventing international tension
2. The K is an attempt to destabilize the spread of American values and culture, which is bad
3. No judge has the right to force an imperialistic mindset on others

[Marxist]

Since this is LD you never say "K", it should just be another contention that is independent.

Links: If you have the link to case don't worry about linking it to the res, that just takes time to say reject the res and case and explain both.

Impacts: Just pick one or two, no need to go hog wild. Also don't say "western morality doesn't exist" this says, hey link goes bye and you are left with nothing.

Next should be your implications if you decide to K the res but since you shouldn't don't worry about that.

Don't worry about an alternative, that is your negative advocacy in the round, you don't need to repeat it.

Voters come in when you weigh the round on vc's and thats where you say your one and two plus impacts. Don't say the third one because the judge can do whatever the **** they want to, unless it is against the rules.